Free Resources / Writing Sample Answers

Cambridge 16 Writing Task 1 Test 1 - Sample Answers (Band 9 to 4-5)

Real band 9, 8, 7 and 6.5 sample answers for this prompt, plus a genuine band 4-5 answer so you can see exactly what pulls a score down. Every sample comes with examiner-style notes on Task Achievement, Coherence & Cohesion, Lexical Resource and Grammatical Range & Accuracy.

The Prompt

Electrical Appliances and Housework Hours

The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Write at least 150 words.

The Data

% of households with electrical appliances (1920-2019)

Washing machine: 8% (1920) → 65% (1960) → 88% (2019)

Refrigerator: 0% (1920) → 50% (1960) → 100% (2019)

Vacuum cleaner: 2% (1920) → 72% (1960) → 100% (2019)

Hours of housework per week, per household (1920-2019)

Hours of housework: 50 (1920) → 35 (1960) → 10 (2019)

Want feedback like this on your own writing?

Sign up free →

Band 9

193 words

Explicitly links the timing of the steepest housework decline to the fastest period of appliance adoption, rather than describing two separate trends.

The two tables compare the percentage of households owning three electrical appliances with the number of hours spent on housework per week, in one country between 1920 and 2019.

Overall, ownership of all three appliances rose dramatically over the century, with refrigerators and vacuum cleaners eventually reaching full or near-full ownership, while housework hours fell steadily and consistently across the same period, an inverse relationship that strongly suggests these appliances played a major role in reducing domestic labour.

In 1920, appliance ownership was minimal: only 8% of households had a washing machine, 2% a vacuum cleaner, and refrigerators were entirely absent. By 2019, however, refrigerators and vacuum cleaners had both reached 100% ownership, while washing machines, though still the least common of the three, had risen to 88%.

Housework hours declined from 50 hours per week in 1920 to just 10 by 2019, a fivefold reduction. Notably, the steepest declines in housework hours, between 1940 and 1980, coincided with the period of fastest appliance adoption, particularly for refrigerators and vacuum cleaners, which both surged from roughly 15-40% to around 90% ownership over those four decades, reinforcing the clear link between the two trends.

Examiner Notes

Task Achievement: Covers both tables with a precise overview identifying the genuinely notable feature: the inverse relationship between appliance ownership and housework hours, supported by a specific decade-by-decade comparison.

Coherence & Cohesion: A clear overview precedes detail organised by table, with cohesive devices ("however", "notably") linking the two data sets naturally.

Lexical Resource: Precise, varied language ("a fivefold reduction", "coincided with", "reinforcing") used accurately throughout.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy: Wide range of accurate structures, including comparatives, used with full control.

Band 8

163 words

Accurate and clearly organised, just slightly less analytically framed than a band 9 answer.

The two tables show the percentage of households owning three electrical appliances and the number of hours spent on housework per week, in one country between 1920 and 2019.

Overall, ownership of all three appliances increased greatly over the century, with refrigerators and vacuum cleaners both reaching 100% ownership by 2019, while the number of hours spent on housework fell steadily throughout the same period.

In 1920, very few households owned these appliances: only 8% had a washing machine, 2% had a vacuum cleaner, and no households had a refrigerator. By 2019, refrigerators and vacuum cleaners had both reached 100%, while washing machines had risen to 88%, still slightly behind the other two appliances.

Housework hours dropped from 50 hours per week in 1920 to only 10 hours by 2019. The biggest drops in housework hours happened between 1940 and 1980, which was also when appliance ownership, especially for refrigerators and vacuum cleaners, increased the fastest, suggesting these two trends were closely connected.

Examiner Notes

Task Achievement: Covers both tables accurately with a clear overview, including the connection between the two trends, though it is described a little more simply than in the band 9 answer.

Coherence & Cohesion: Clearly organised with an overview followed by detail grouped by table; cohesive devices are accurate throughout.

Lexical Resource: Good range of vocabulary for describing trends, though "closely connected" is slightly less precise than the higher-band answer's more analytical phrasing.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy: Accurate throughout, with a good mix of simple and complex sentence structures.

Band 7

170 words

All figures are correct, but the connection between the two trends is only loosely stated rather than clearly demonstrated.

The two tables give information about the percentage of households with three electrical appliances and the number of hours spent on housework, in one country between 1920 and 2019.

Overall, all three appliances became much more common over the period, and at the same time, the number of hours spent doing housework went down a lot.

In 1920, hardly any households had these appliances: 8% had a washing machine, 2% had a vacuum cleaner, and no households had a refrigerator. By 2019, refrigerators and vacuum cleaners had both reached 100% ownership, while washing machines were slightly lower, at 88%.

Housework hours went down from 50 hours a week in 1920 to only 10 hours by 2019. The biggest decreases in housework hours happened between 1940 and 1980, at the same time as appliance ownership increased quickly, which suggests the two things were connected. This pattern indicates that the introduction of labour-saving appliances during those middle decades had a particularly strong effect on reducing the time households spent on domestic chores.

Examiner Notes

Task Achievement: Reports both tables' figures accurately with a basic overview, but the overview does not clearly connect the timing of the two trends the way the higher-band answers do.

Coherence & Cohesion: Clearly organised by table, though figures are listed with fairly plain connecting language throughout.

Lexical Resource: Adequate range for the task; figures are accurate but connecting language stays fairly plain throughout.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy: Generally accurate, mostly simple sentence structures; meaning is always clear.

Band 6.5

165 words

The figures are all correct, but agreement errors appear in almost every sentence.

The two table give information about percentage of household with three electrical appliance and number of hour spent on housework, in one country between 1920 and 2019.

Overall, all three appliance become much more common over the period, and at the same time, the number of hour spent doing housework go down a lot.

In 1920, hardly any household have this appliance: 8% have washing machine, 2% have vacuum cleaner, and no household have refrigerator. By 2019, refrigerator and vacuum cleaner have both reach 100% ownership, while washing machine was slightly lower, at 88%.

Housework hour go down from 50 hour a week in 1920 to only 10 hour by 2019. The biggest decrease in housework hour happen between 1940 and 1980, at the same time as appliance ownership increase quickly, which suggest the two thing was connected. This pattern indicate that the introduction of labour-saving appliance during those middle decade have a particularly strong effect on reducing the time household spend on domestic chore.

Examiner Notes

Task Achievement: Reports both tables' figures accurately, matching the content of the band 7 answer.

Coherence & Cohesion: Clearly organised by table, following the same structure as the higher-band answers.

Lexical Resource: Limited by "appliance" and "hour" being used without their plural forms throughout.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy: Frequent subject-verb agreement errors ("table give", "all three appliance become", "housework hour go down") appear in nearly every sentence.

Band 4-5 - What to Avoid

41 words

No exact figures appear anywhere in the report, and the three separate appliances are never distinguished.

This table show appliance and housework from 1920 to 2019.

More people have machine now. Housework hour go down too.

I think machine make housework easy, this is why people spend less time now, this is my opinion about this topic.

Examiner Notes

Task Achievement: Exact figures are missing for every appliance and time period, the three appliances are never distinguished from one another, and the closing comment is a personal opinion that has no place in a Task 1 report. At well under 150 words, the response is also underlength.

Coherence & Cohesion: Reads as three short, disconnected remarks rather than an organised comparison across both tables.

Lexical Resource: Vague, repetitive vocabulary ("more people have machine", "go down too") used instead of the specific figures given in the tables.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy: Frequent errors throughout ("table show", "More people have machine now").

Practise this exact prompt yourself, with a live timer and word count

Free to sign up, no credit card required.

Sign Up Free →

These sample answers are written independently for Prep IELTS Now to illustrate real band-score differences. They are a study aid, not official Cambridge or IELTS material.