Free Resources / Writing Sample Answers

Cambridge 17 Writing Task 1 Test 3 - Sample Answers (Band 9 to 4-5)

Real band 9, 8, 7 and 6.5 sample answers for this prompt, plus a genuine band 4-5 answer so you can see exactly what pulls a score down. Every sample comes with examiner-style notes on Task Achievement, Coherence & Cohesion, Lexical Resource and Grammatical Range & Accuracy.

The Prompt

Family Spending 1968 and 2018

The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Write at least 150 words.

The Data

Average weekly family spending (% of weekly income) - 1968 vs 2018

Food: 35% (1968) → 17% (2018)

Housing: 10% (1968) → 18% (2018)

Fuel and power: 6% (1968) → 4% (2018)

Clothing and footwear: 10% (1968) → 5% (2018)

Household goods: 8% (1968) → 6% (2018)

Personal goods: 4% (1968) → 4% (2018)

Transport: 8% (1968) → 14% (2018)

Leisure: 8% (1968) → 17% (2018)

Want feedback like this on your own writing?

Sign up free →

Band 9

175 words

Identifies the one category that stayed entirely unchanged, showing genuine data selection rather than only reporting the categories that changed.

The table compares how families in one country allocated their weekly income across eight spending categories in 1968 and 2018.

Overall, spending on food fell dramatically over the fifty-year period and no longer dominates family budgets as it once did, while housing, transport, and leisure all claimed substantially larger shares by 2018, reflecting a broad shift from spending on necessities towards spending on housing and discretionary activities.

In 1968, food accounted for the largest single share of weekly income at 35%, more than double any other category, while housing took just 10%. By 2018, however, food's share had fallen to only 17%, overtaken by housing, which had nearly doubled to 18%, becoming the largest category of spending.

Leisure spending nearly tripled in relative terms, rising from 8% to 17%, and transport spending rose similarly, from 8% to 14%, while clothing and footwear fell by half, from 10% to 5%. Fuel and power also declined slightly, from 6% to 4%, and personal goods remained the only category to stay entirely unchanged at 4% across both years.

Examiner Notes

Task Achievement: Accurately covers all eight categories with a precise overview identifying the genuinely notable shift from food towards housing, transport, and leisure, supported by specific figures.

Coherence & Cohesion: A clear overview precedes detail organised by category importance, with cohesive devices ("however", "similarly") linking figures naturally.

Lexical Resource: Precise, varied language ("discretionary activities", "nearly tripled", "remained unchanged") used accurately throughout.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy: Wide range of accurate structures, including comparatives and complex sentences, used with full control.

Band 8

151 words

Accurate and clearly organised, just slightly less varied in its vocabulary than a band 9 answer.

The table shows how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 compared with 2018, across eight spending categories.

Overall, spending on food decreased significantly over the period, while spending on housing, transport, and leisure all increased considerably, showing a shift away from basic necessities towards housing and leisure activities.

In 1968, food took up the largest portion of income at 35%, much more than any other category. By 2018, this had fallen to 17%, and housing had become the largest category instead, rising from 10% to 18%.

Leisure spending increased greatly, from 8% to 17%, and transport also rose, from 8% to 14%. Clothing and footwear fell from 10% to 5%, while personal goods stayed the same at 4% in both years. Overall, these figures suggest that families in 2018 had considerably more disposable income to spend on discretionary activities than families did fifty years earlier in 1968.

Examiner Notes

Task Achievement: Covers all eight categories accurately with a clear overview, including the unchanged personal goods figure, though described a little more simply than in the band 9 answer.

Coherence & Cohesion: Clearly organised with an overview followed by detail grouped by category; cohesive devices are accurate throughout.

Lexical Resource: Good range of vocabulary for describing change, though slightly less varied than the higher-band answer's phrasing.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy: Accurate throughout, with a good mix of simple and complex sentence structures.

Band 7

152 words

All figures are correct, but the unchanged personal goods category is only briefly mentioned rather than clearly highlighted.

The table shows how families spent their weekly income in 1968 and 2018 across different categories.

Overall, families spent much less on food in 2018 than in 1968, and more on housing, transport, and leisure.

In 1968, food was the biggest expense at 35%. By 2018, this had gone down a lot to 17%, and housing had increased from 10% to 18%, becoming the biggest expense instead.

Leisure spending went up from 8% to 17%, and transport went up from 8% to 14%. Clothing went down from 10% to 5%, and personal goods stayed at 4% in both years. Overall, these changes suggest that families in 2018 had more money available to spend on things other than basic necessities, compared to families in 1968, who spent a much bigger share of their income simply on food and had less left over for transport, leisure, or other activities, such as holidays or entertainment.

Examiner Notes

Task Achievement: Reports all eight categories accurately with a basic overview, but the overview does not clearly identify the unchanged personal goods figure the way the higher-band answers do.

Coherence & Cohesion: Clearly organised by category, though figures are listed with fairly plain connecting language throughout.

Lexical Resource: Adequate range for the task; figures are accurate but connecting language stays fairly plain throughout.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy: Generally accurate, mostly simple sentence structures; meaning is always clear.

Band 6.5

152 words

The figures are all correct, but agreement errors appear in almost every sentence.

The table show how family spend their weekly income in 1968 and 2018 across different category.

Overall, family spend much less on food in 2018 than in 1968, and more on housing, transport, and leisure.

In 1968, food was the biggest expense at 35%. By 2018, this have gone down a lot to 17%, and housing have increase from 10% to 18%, becoming the biggest expense instead.

Leisure spending go up from 8% to 17%, and transport go up from 8% to 14%. Clothing go down from 10% to 5%, and personal good stay at 4% in both year. Overall, this change suggest that family in 2018 have more money available to spend on thing other than basic necessity, compared to family in 1968, who spend a much bigger share of their income simply on food and have less left over for transport, leisure, or other activity, such as holiday or entertainment.

Examiner Notes

Task Achievement: Reports all eight categories accurately, matching the content of the band 7 answer.

Coherence & Cohesion: Clearly organised by category, following the same structure as the higher-band answers.

Lexical Resource: Limited by "category" and "good" being used without their plural forms throughout.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy: Frequent subject-verb agreement errors ("table show", "family spend", "housing have increase") appear in nearly every sentence.

Band 4-5 - What to Avoid

35 words

Six of the eight spending categories are missing entirely, and a personal opinion is inserted into what should be a factual report.

This table show family spending in 1968 and 2018.

People spend more on house now, less on food, this is normal I think.

Life is more expensive now, this is my opinion about this table.

Examiner Notes

Task Achievement: Only two of the eight spending categories are mentioned, six categories including transport, leisure, and clothing are missing entirely, and a personal opinion is inserted, which has no place in a Task 1 report. At well under 150 words, the response is also underlength.

Coherence & Cohesion: Reads as three short, disconnected remarks rather than an organised comparison across all categories.

Lexical Resource: Vague, repetitive vocabulary ("more on house", "less on food") used instead of the specific figures given in the table.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy: Frequent errors throughout ("this table show", "life is more expensive now").

Practise this exact prompt yourself, with a live timer and word count

Free to sign up, no credit card required.

Sign Up Free →

These sample answers are written independently for Prep IELTS Now to illustrate real band-score differences. They are a study aid, not official Cambridge or IELTS material.